Ron Erhardt and Jesse Ventura. Which of these politicians is trying to do the right thing?
Erhardt is a victim of party discipline. A Republican, he voted with the DFL in the Minnesota House to overturn Gov. Pawlenty’s veto of the transportation bill. Erhardt, a nine-termer representing Edina, was stripped of committee leadership and denied Republican endorsement because he — horrors — thinks for himself and does what he sees is best for his constituents and the state. So he clearly is out of step with the pusillanimous Republicans. Asking citizens to pay for the common services and infrastructure we share is clearly a dangerous, subversive, commie concept to the GOP.
Erhardt, who says his constituents, a majority of whom have gone for John Kerry, Amy Klobuchar and Tim Pawlenty in the past, are “fed up with the right-wing junk that the Republicans have been pushing for years.”
You go, guy. Erhardt’s going to run for re-election as an independent and says he’ll probably caucus with the Dems. As someone who lived in Edina once (after mocking it for years from South Minneapolis), I wish I still lived there so I could vote for Ron. We should reward independent thinking. And courage.
And then there’s Jesse. He’ll deign to inform his subjects via the celebrity megaphone of the Larry King show on Monday whether he’ll swagger into the Minnesota U.S. Senate race.
Jesse is the definition of “cocky” in all its meanings. The dictionary says “overly self-assertive or self-confident.” Jesse’s twitching pulsing arrogance says tower of misguided testosterone. I smoked Jesse’s dope when he ran for governor, had fun voting for him. Never again. Jesse’s all about Jesse.
“People want someone to shake up Washington,” he was quoted as saying in the Strib (he doesn’t lower himself to talk to local reporters, which tells you about his commitment to openness and accountability). “I keep asking myself, if not me, then who?” People who feel they are the answer scare the crap outta me. (Notice how Obama in his whole campaign has talked about what we can do, while Clinton said “I” “I” “I”?)
Washington needs shaking up. Hell, Minnesota and its voters need shaking up. But the right person to do it is someone who can see beyond his own chest. Or other parts.
–Bruce Benidt
Filed under: Media, Politics | Tagged: Jesse Ventura, political courage, Ron Erhardt
Though, he was sanctioned by his fellow legislators, Ron Erhardt is not being “punished” by Senate 41 Republicans. His challenger for the Republican endorsement, Keith Downey, started his campaign in November of 2007, well before the 2008 session even started. Erhardt losing his party’s confidence is not just about the 2008 session or one vote to override. It is a decision by the Republican party that Erhardt no longer represents our views and the ideals that have made Edina so great. Edina has for decades been represented in the legislature by Republicans and it has gotten us pretty far.
Erhardt has been moving to the left for years on many of his votes. He is openly pro choice and voted to allow municipalities to offer same-sex partner benefits. The final straw has been his votes in recent sessions to raise taxes and push transit projects. Though, given the opportunity to gracefully retire from public service at age 78, he has refused and has let his ego take over his ideals.
It won’t make much difference to the Democrats in November is Ron wins and cacuses with them, given their already weighty majority. But Edina will lose alot, being represented by someone who is a loose canon with no loyalty.
I’ll be interested to see how many die-hard, free-market advocates speak up against the upcoming bailout of Fannie and Freddie. For that matter, how many led the charge against the Bear Stearns bailout?
Privatize profit, socialize risk. That’s how our system has been operating for the last 30 years.
“He is openly pro choice and voted to allow municipalities to offer same-sex partner benefits.”
Which allows Twice Blessed to retain his/her options and allows Edina not to offer benefits if the town is aligned the way TB thinks it is.
Sounds like the local version of state’s rights to me.
Twice just doesn’t recognize that s/he has been Thrice Blessed by having Ron Erhardt, one of the very few true, honest, dedicated public servants – who statistically actually votes the documented wishes of that vast majority of Edinans (and who in truth have not been Republican for a dozen or more years.) Check his website ronerhardt.com. He also wins by landslides which have nothing to do with the GOP since he even landslides when other Republican candidates get trounced. Keith Downey got the Republican nomination because a far right christian conservative church and its leadership committees, Christ Presbyterian in Edina, decided to muster christian membership out to pack the caucuses and take over the precinct delegate control. A good organizing job that will lose the district to the DFL who will boot the far right leaning Downey (who is now trying to re-mascerade as a moderate – talk about christian honesty.) Packing caucuses with your own people does not mean that the majority of electorate or even party members are in your camp – as countless other candidates have found out in other elections.
Reinan: The concept of government bailouts like these seems utterly absurd to this free-market-ist libertarian, but I wonder if it’s not an unfortunate necessity (to use that word a little loosely) at this point.
The market isn’t free to begin with when you have two massive, government-sponsored enterprises operating as these do. Once that true freeness and openness is ruined, it’s probably going to take some additional meddling to avoid deeper shit.
But I’m no economist.
Twice Blessed:
Your observation “Erhardt no longer represents our views and the ideals that have made Edina so great” leads me to ask: Do you honestly believe there are no same-sex couples in Edina? That no woman who believes in the pro-choice option has or can never make a valuable contribution to the health and vitality of the burg you love so well?
Please. Why can’t conservatives (who should believe in limited government oversight) stop obsessing over the private lives of other consenting adults and go back to wondering why they have no private lives of their own?